<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../assets/xml/rss.xsl" media="all"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title> (Posts about dirac)</title><link>http://restframe.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://restframe.com/categories/dirac.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><language>en</language><copyright>Contents © 2020 &lt;a href="mailto:keith@restframe.com"&gt;Restframe Labs&lt;/a&gt; </copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2020 00:01:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>Nikola (getnikola.com)</generator><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><item><title>elliptical tracks</title><link>http://restframe.com/posts/elliptical-tracks.html</link><dc:creator>Restframe Labs</dc:creator><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class="figure align-left" style="width: 180px"&gt;
&lt;img alt="/images/et.png" src="http://restframe.com/images/et.png" style="width: 180px;"&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just put up my latest paper,
&lt;a class="reference external" href="https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/201907.0181/v1"&gt;Elliptical tracks: are these superluminal electrons?&lt;/a&gt;
at Preprints.org.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This paper shows elliptical particle tracks in photographic emulsions
that turn out to have semi-major axis sizes that are almost exactly
&lt;span class="math"&gt;\(137^2 n^2\)&lt;/span&gt; different from corresponding Bohr-Sommerfeld electron
ellipse semi-major axis sizes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://restframe.com/posts/elliptical-tracks.html"&gt;Read more…&lt;/a&gt; (1 min remaining to read)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>dirac</category><category>extended relativity</category><category>mathjax</category><category>monopoles</category><category>quantization</category><category>recami</category><category>schwinger</category><category>tachyons</category><guid>http://restframe.com/posts/elliptical-tracks.html</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:28:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>magnetic monopole mass</title><link>http://restframe.com/posts/magnetic-monopole-mass.html</link><dc:creator>keith</dc:creator><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class="figure align-left" style="width: 180px"&gt;
&lt;img alt="/images/monopole.png" src="http://restframe.com/images/monopole.png" style="width: 180px;"&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Shortly after the publication of Dirac's seminal paper &lt;a class="footnote-reference" href="http://restframe.com/posts/magnetic-monopole-mass.html#id11" id="id1"&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; on the
quantization of electric charge in 1931, experimenters began the
search for magnetic monopoles.  Dirac's result indicated a value
for magnetic charge of a monopole, but the mass was not predicted
and could be any value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://restframe.com/posts/magnetic-monopole-mass.html"&gt;Read more…&lt;/a&gt; (5 min remaining to read)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>dirac</category><category>extended relativity</category><category>mathjax</category><category>monopoles</category><category>quantization</category><category>recami</category><category>tachyons</category><guid>http://restframe.com/posts/magnetic-monopole-mass.html</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:43:37 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>